@dredmorbius i'm trying to put a meaning to "autonomy of communication" and can imagine:
1 control over who gets or doesn't get my message
2 the right to dictate the form & content of any message i want to send out
it seems to me 2 is basically the lowest-common-denominator subset of free speech, which i guess is for me:
1 the right to dictate the form & content of any message i want to send out
2 the ability & right to broadcast such a message without fear of state or community violence
@dredmorbius given those definitions i'll take autonomy
some things said to certain people at certain times are best stopped with violence, and where it's not but there's violence anyway then autonomy point 1 gives those affected a chance to renegotiate the terms in the long run
@carcinopithecus Might there be other elements or aspects?
@dredmorbius yeah, though i find that anything beyond this minimally-recognizable profile gets controversial fast
(though for both of these i'm not making any real distinction between law and fact where a purely de jure freedom would satisfy anything if people on the ground aren't actually able to exercise it)
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!